Find Us: https://iu.libguides.com/librarians |
|
Call Us: 317-274-0469 |
|
Text Us: 317-279-6630 |
|
Email Us: Service & Information Desk |
|
Follow Us: @IUILibrary |
|
Like Us: IUI University Library |
|
Follow Us: @IUILibrary |
|
IM Us: Ask a Librarian |
Flowchart from The Literature Review (2009) by Machi and McEvoy
A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.
The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research paper will contain a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support for a new insight that you contribute. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions.
Literature reviews can be tricky because you don't want to stop before you've found everything relevant to your topic. There are a couple of guidelines for knowing when to stop looking for materials.
Characteristics of a Good Literature Review |
Characteristics of a Poor Literature Review |
Synthesizes available research |
Basically an annotated bibliography |
Critical evaluation of sources |
Analysis confined to describing the work |
Appropriated breadth and depth |
Narrow and Shallow |
Clear and concise |
Confusing and Longwinded |
Uses rigorous and consistent methods |
Constructed arbitrarily |